Is anyone else finding this site is slower than normal to load?
-
- Involved
- Posts: 66
- Joined: 19 Sep 2016, 01:12
Re: Is anyone else finding this site is slower than normal to load?
Thanks for the update.
-
- Involved
- Posts: 95
- Joined: 26 Jul 2024, 16:58
- Gender:
Re: Is anyone else finding this site is slower than normal to load?
Sometimes this discourages me so much, I posted several things in the video master list thread but no one seemed to look
-
- Site Staff
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: 01 Sep 2016, 10:32
- Location: The Netherlands
- Gender:
Re: Is anyone else finding this site is slower than normal to load?
I assure you that your contributions are being read and enjoyed. You have done a great deal towards livening up the site in the last few weeks.
Speaking for myself I don't write a response to everything that people post because I don't want to spam the place any more than I already do and sometimes I simply don't have anything to add anyway. But I definitely read everything that everyone posts.
Another thing to remember is that the vast majority of readers of the site never post anything anyway.
So please don't be discouraged if you sometimes don't get any response.
-
- Site Staff
- Posts: 688
- Joined: 17 Sep 2016, 20:50
Re: Is anyone else finding this site is slower than normal to load?
Indeed keep posting Madius, sometimes I comment, but most of the time I don't. It is nice though, when people do comment, but don't be disheartened if they don't.
-
- Can't stay away...
- Posts: 591
- Joined: 28 Sep 2016, 20:16
Re: Is anyone else finding this site is slower than normal to load?
If this site could implement a "thumbs up" kind of reaction, then I don't need to choose between spamming one useless "+1" post versus apparently ignoring that post.
-
- Arrived
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 26 Jan 2024, 22:23
- Gender:
Re: Is anyone else finding this site is slower than normal to load?
I'd give this a thumbs up, if I could!googlism2008 wrote: ↑09 Aug 2024, 13:39 If this site could implement a "thumbs up" kind of reaction, then I don't need to choose between spamming one useless "+1" post versus apparently ignoring that post.